HomePolitics & Social Sciences BooksCultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History
Skip to product information
1 of 1

Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History

paperbackJuly 27, 1998
Regular price $88.78 USD
Regular price Sale price $88.78 USD
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Secure Checkout
Quality Guaranteed
New In Stock
ISBN-13: 9780691002392 ISBN-10: 0691002398
Publisher
Princeton University Press
Binding
paperback
Published
July 27, 1998
Weight
1.0 lbs
Dimensions
23.50×1.90×15.20 cm

About this book

Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History by Alastair Iain Johnston. paperback edition. ISBN: 9780691002392.

Cultural Realism is an in-depth study of premodern Chinese strategic thought that has important implications for contemporary international relations theory. In applying a Western theoretical debate to China, Iain Johnston advances rigorous procedures for testing for the existence and influence of "strategic culture." Johnston sets out to answer two empirical questions. Is there a substantively consistent and temporally persistent Chinese strategic culture? If so, to what extent has it influenced Chinas approaches to security? The focus of his study is the Ming dynastys grand strategy against the Mongols (1368-1644). First Johnston examines ancient military texts as sources of Chinese strategic culture, using cognitive mapping, symbolic analysis and congruence tests to determine whether there is a consistent grand strategic preference ranking across texts that constitutes a single strategic culture. Then he applies similar techniques to determine the effect of the strategic culture on the strategic preferences of the Ming decision makers. Finally, he assesses the effect of these preferences on Ming policies towards the Mongol "threat." The findings of this book challenge dominant interpretations of traditional Chinese strategic thought. They suggest also that the roots of realpolitik are ideational and not predominantly structural. The results lead to the surprising conclusion that there may be, in fact, fewer cross-national differences in strategic culture than proponents of the "strategic culture" approach think.