Defining Russia Musically
Couldn't load pickup availability
About this book
The world-renowned musicologist Richard Taruskin devoted much of his career to helping listeners appreciate Russian and Soviet music in new and sometimes controversial ways. Defining Russia Musically represents one of his landmark achievements: here Taruskin uses music together with history and politics to illustrate the many ways in which Russian national identity has been constructed both from within Russia and from the Western perspective. He contends that it is through music that the powerful myth of Russias "national character" can best be understood. Russian art music like Russia itself Taruskin writes has "always been tinged or tainted . . . with an air of alteritysensed exploited bemoaned reveled in traded on and defended against both from within and from without." The authors goal is to explore this assumption of otherness in an all-encompassing work that re-creates the cultural contexts of the folksong anthologies of the 1700s the operas symphonies and ballets of the 1800s the modernist masterpieces of the 1900s and the hugely fraught but ambiguous products of the Soviet period. Taruskin begins by showing how enlightened aristocrats reactionary romantics and the theorists and victims of totalitarianism have variously fashioned their vision of Russian society in musical terms. He then examines how Russia as a whole shaped its identity in contrast to an "East" during the age of its imperialist expansion and in contrast to two different musical "Wests " Germany and Italy during the formative years of its national consciousness. The final section focuses on four individual composers each characterized both as a self-consciously Russian creator and as a European and each placed in perspective within a revealing hermeneutic scheme. In the culminating chaptersChaikovsky and the Human Scriabin and the Superhuman Stravinsky and the Subhuman and Shostakovich and the InhumanTaruskin offers especially thought-provoking insights for example on Chaikovskys status as the "last great eighteenth-century composer" and on Stravinskys espousal of formalism as a reactionary literally counterrevolutionary move.
