HomeHistory BooksDelivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate
Skip to product information
1 of 1

Delivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate

hardcoverMarch 20, 2014
Regular price $28.57 USD
Regular price Sale price $28.57 USD
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Secure Checkout
Quality Guaranteed
New In Stock
ISBN-13: 9780801452246 ISBN-10: 0801452244
Publisher
Cornell University Press
Binding
hardcover
Published
March 20, 2014
Weight
1.0 lbs
Dimensions
22.90×2.20×15.20 cm

About this book

Delivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate by Azari, Julia R.. hardcover edition. ISBN: 9780801452246.

Presidents have long invoked electoral mandates to justify the use of executive power. In Delivering the Peoples Message, Julia R. Azari draws on an original dataset of more than 1,500 presidential communications, as well as primary documents from six presidential libraries, to systematically examine choices made by presidents ranging from Herbert Hoover in 1928 to Barack Obama during his 2008 election. Azari argues that Ronald Reagans election in 1980 marked a shift from the modern presidency formed by Franklin Delano Roosevelt to what she identifies as a more partisan era for the presidency. This partisan model is a form of governance in which the president appears to require a popular mandate in order to manage unruly and deeply contrary elements within his own party and succeed in the face of staunch resistance from the opposition party. Azari finds that when the presidency enjoys high public esteem and party polarization is low, mandate rhetoric is less frequent and employs broad themes. By contrast, presidents turn to mandate rhetoric when the office loses legitimacy, as in the wake of Watergate and Vietnam and during periods of intense polarization. In the twenty-first century, these two factors have converged. As a result, presidents rely on mandate rhetoric to defend their choices to supporters and critics alike, simultaneously creating unrealistic expectations about the electoral promises they will be able to fulfill.