HomePolitics & Social Sciences BooksImmigrants and the Right to Stay (Boston Review Books)
Skip to product information
1 of 1

Immigrants and the Right to Stay (Boston Review Books)

hardcoverJanuary 1, 2010
Regular price $61.77 USD
Regular price Sale price $61.77 USD
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Secure Checkout
Quality Guaranteed
New In Stock
ISBN-13: 9780262014830 ISBN-10: 0262014831
Publisher
MIT Press
Binding
hardcover
Published
January 1, 2010
Weight
0.4 lbs
Dimensions
18.40×12.10×1.30 cm

About this book

Immigrants and the Right to Stay (Boston Review Books) by Carens, Joseph H.. hardcover edition. ISBN: 9780262014830.

A proposal that immigrants in the United States should be offered a path to legalized status. The Obama administration promises to take on comprehensive immigration reform in 2010, setting policymakers to work on legislation that might give the approximately eleven million undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States a path to legalization of status. Commentators have been quick to observe that any such proposal will face intense opposition. Few issues have so divided the country in recent years as immigration. Immigrants and the Right to Stay brings the debate into the realm of public reason. Political theorist Joseph Carens argues that although states have a right to control their borders, the right to deport those who violate immigration laws is not absolute. With time, immigrants develop a moral claim to stay. Emphasizing the moral importance of social membership, and drawing on principles widely recognized in liberal democracies, Carens calls for a rolling amnesty that gives unauthorized migrants a path to regularize their status once they have been settled for a significant period of time. After Carens makes his case, six experts from across the political spectrum respond. Some protest that he goes too far; others say he does not go far enough in protecting the rights of migrants. Several raise competing moral claims and others help us understand how the immigration problem became so large. Carens agrees that no moral claim is absolute, and that, on any complex public issue, principled debate involves weighing competing concerns. But for him the balance falls clearly on the side of amnesty.