HomeThe Tilted Arc Controversy: Dangerous Precedent ?
Skip to product information
1 of 1

The Tilted Arc Controversy: Dangerous Precedent ?

paperbackDecember 4, 2001
Regular price $92.37 USD
Regular price Sale price $92.37 USD
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Secure Checkout
Quality Guaranteed
New In Stock
ISBN-13: 9780816637867 ISBN-10: 0816637865
Publisher
University of Minnesota Press
Binding
paperback
Published
December 4, 2001
Weight
0.9 lbs
Dimensions
25.40×1.50×17.80 cm

About this book

The Tilted Arc Controversy: Dangerous Precedent ? by Senie, Harriet F.. paperback edition. ISBN: 9780816637867.

A comprehensive look at a controversy that continues to fuel debates about the role of public art in America. Since its installation at and subsequent removal from New York City’s Federal Plaza, noted sculptor Richard Serra’s Tilted Arc has been a touchstone for debates over the role of public art. Installed in 1981, the 10-foot-high, 120-foot-long curved wall of Cor-Ten self-rusting steel instantly became a magnet for criticism. Art critics in the New York Times and the Village Voice labeled it the city’s worst public sculpture, and many denounced it as an example of the elitism associated with art and as an obstacle to the use and enjoyment of the plaza. Harriet F. Senie explores the history of Tilted Arc, including its 1979 commission and the heated public hearings that eventually led to its removal in 1989 (it was dismantled and is currently stored in a government warehouse in Maryland). Analyzing the archive of popular opinion, Senie shows how the sculpture was caught in an avalanche of shifting local and national discussions about public funding for the arts. She examines the tactics of those opposed to the sculpture and the media’s superficial and sensational coverage of the controversy, reframing the dialogue in terms of public art, public space, and public policy instead of the question of whether the removal of Tilted Arc was poetic justice or a dangerous precedent. Senie provides an enlightening history and analysis of a controversy that will continue to inform our discussions about public art for years to come.