What About Immunizations? Exposing the Vaccine Philosophy

Many parents invest more time and scrutiny in selecting house paint or a new car than in researching the possible dangers that routine vaccinations pose to the health of their children. Many are not aware that the number of children suffering vaccine damage is escalating exponentially in tandem with the increase in the imposed vaccination schedule. Most also do not consider that a vaccine will inject foreign DNA and toxins into their childs body toxins that can play havoc with their sensitive immune systems. Yet while other medicines and products on the market are held accountable to safety standards because of the vaccine philosophy a term coined by the author vaccines do not receive equal scrutiny and instead are a priori deemed safe and effective their purported benefits believed to outweigh any risks. It is this philosophy that promotes vaccines blindly and undermines honest inquiry into the possible dangers of vaccination. Consequently when parents are told by their doctors that their children must submit to the vaccination schedule they do not hear any disclosure of risks. In addition schools have become the check point of vaccination compliance and unless parents know that they can sign a religious or philosophical exemption their unvaccinated children will not be allowed to attend school. In this stifling atmosphere it has been entirely up to parents and independent researchers to mount their own inquiries into vaccines and vaccine policy. In its newly revised and updated seventh edition What about Immunizations? is a thorough guide to the history efficacy research practices policy protocol and political issues surrounding vaccines. Author Cynthia Cournoyer has researched and written about the vaccine controversy for nearly thirty years. Our society has begun to seriously question the entire conventional medical paradigm which includes the practice of universal vaccination. Cournoyer points to two opposing health approaches that lead to completely different practices of health care. When Dr. Weston Price studied healthy populations worldwide he found that their immunity to all disease was due to the nutrient-density of their diets. His findings corroborate the research of nineteenth-century French physiologist Claude Bernard who found that germs and disease would only proliferate if the immune system was weakenedthat the general condition of the body was the underlying invitation to disease. In conjunction Bernards contemporary French biologist Antoine Bchamp discovered that microorganisms are constantly developing in our tissues. If the tissue is healthy they will provide life support for the cells; if the cells are weakened they will produce disease. Likewise Hannah Allen author of Dont Get Stuck: The Case Against Vaccinations and Injections argued that diseased microbes are a product of the poor level of health in the host. On the other hand Louis Pasteur believed that germs caused disease period and he is primarily credited with establishing the basic hypothesis of modern germ theory. Cournoyer shows us how vaccines were developed in support of Pasteurs principles. She then points to the poor track record they have displayed in actually preventing disease. First the belief that vaccination creates true immunity to disease has never been proven. Historically epidemics have come and gone naturally often due to societal changes in sanitation and true herd immunityimmunity created over time by large groups of people recovering from cases of the actual disease. This was true with diseases like small pox polio and diphtheria which all declined in unvaccinated populations as fast as they did in highly vaccinated countries. Yet vaccination was credited with the victory over disease. In fact however many diseases rebounded when vaccines against them were introduced. Vaccination was originally embraced because people knew that contracting a mild form of a disease would procure life-long immunity to it. However this permanent kind of immunity is much different than the mechanism at play via vaccination. A vaccination injects a weakened form of the disease in the body to provoke an immune response. Thus the reason vaccines are reported to work is that they have the ability to raise antibody levels and this is acknowledged as an indication of protection from the disease. However Cournoyer provides research proving that this type of immune response may give a false immunity and instead permanently weaken the bodys immune system an effect amplified by the increase in the number of recommended vaccines administered today. This outcome is blatantly evident through vaccine efficacy records which reveal that some people become ill with the diseases for which they have been vaccinated. Additionally there are more children who have chronic illness of all kinds than ever before in history. Given that vaccines challenge immune function are we creating a population of chi